Contact Us | Print Page | Sign In | Join Now
Ask the Experts
Blog Home All Blogs
Search all posts for:   

 

View all (37) posts »
 

Private businesses often balance between company profit and insolvency risk. Is it necessary to perform similar analysis as part of a public sector ERM program, and how would that analysis differ?

Posted By AFERM, Monday, July 22, 2019
Updated: Sunday, November 24, 2024

Question asked by Anonymous

AFERM EXPERTS SAY...

In the government there is no profit metric or insolvency risk.  However, there are costs associated with responding to uncertainties and benefits resulting from those efforts.  For government entities the balancing act occurs between response costs and the benefits received from the results.

When an uncertainty has the potential for positive or direct impact, measuring the benefit received is straightforward and can occur after the fact.  However, when uncertainty has potential for negative impact measuring the benefits received becomes more challenging.  This results from measuring an outcome that, if the response effort is successful, does not occur.

In both situations the business case for responding to a particular uncertainty hinges on the organization’s ability to estimate response costs against the benefits received.  As such, an organization’s confidence in those estimates becomes vital to the decision making process.

This post has not been tagged.

Permalink | Comments (0)
 
© Copyright 2014-2024 AFERM. All Rights Reserved.
Association for Federal Enterprise Risk Management
1050 Connecticut Ave NW, PO Box 66281 | Washington, DC 20035-6281
Contact Us | | Privacy Notice
Request Organization Information
DUNS: 045074054 | CAGE Code: 7PL42
Association for Federal Enterprise Risk Management is a registered 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. Contributions to AFERM are tax deductible to the extent permitted by law. Membership dues and event registration fees are not considered contributions.